Header Ads

Header ADS

GINGER PRINCE TO MARRY "ETHNIC" BRIDE IN DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO UNIFY MULTICULTURAL BRITAIN


In a desperate attempt to unify an increasingly divided and fractious, multicultural Britain, Prince Harry, Queen Elizabeth's ginger-haired grandson, has been tasked with marrying an ethnic minority woman. 

The woman in question is African-American, Meghan Markle, a well-past-her-sell-by-date divorcee, who, at 36, is three years older than Harry, who doesn't have a proper job and is technically a NEET. 

The bride-to-be was formerly married to a US movie producer for two years, but they divorced due to "irreconcilable differences," which probably had something to do with his casting couch duties in Hollywood. Markle herself is a bit-part actress and is known to have had several boyfriends.

Harry's future bride before she started
 using hair-straightening products.
Although it is laudable of Prince Harry to marry a burnt-out 36-year-old cougar, who has been riding the cock carousel for decades, in order to get a bit of "diversity" into the "hideously White" and "heavily German" Royal Family, Markle is a poor choice as she lacks a "high ethnic quotient." 

Although born to a White father and a Black mother, her mother was a university professor, which means she probably had a considerable amount of White blood too. Ms. Markle is therefore genetically much Whiter than Black, and "presents" as near-White with her rather fine features, artificially straightened hair, and Miss-Selfridge-tier fashion choices. 

Although it is unlikely that she will be able to easily produce many children with her burnt-out, 36-year-old ovaries, any offspring that ensue will be even Whiter than her, losing the whole point of marrying an ethnic, which is to make the Royal Family look truly diverse -- all the better to represent multicultural Britain. 

Harry would have been better advised to have married one of these:


Personally I'd go for the one in the middle, despite the heavy use of make-up, which is never a good sign...

But the bottom line here is that this marriage will satisfy no one. Purists who think the Royal Family should only marry fellow Germans will be incensed. But at the same time progressives who think the Royal Family should reflect the "rich diversity" of multicultural Britain -- rather like the police force -- will also be deeply disappointed that the Prince is wedding such a Whitish non-White, and also one that is likely to have few if any children. 

As for Britain's ethnic minorities, they will continue to see the Royal Family as White people, while many of them will continue to feel alienated, hateful, and resentful against Britain -- but not enough to leave.



9 comments

Afterthought said...

Monarchy is stupid.

tito perdue said...

An ambitious divorced blackamoor with garbage-quality chromosomes - the throne lies in the gutter.

Anonymous said...

You don't get more "on the turn" than this woman. Her married life will be like a female version of the portrait of Dorian Gray.

Dykeward said...

One usually fears treading into the arena of diagnostic psychobabble, but can't help on this occasion wondering at it being driven by some need for a maternal influence, rather than the lairy coked-up nouveau riche types he has gravitated to before. His recent emoting on similar subjects to the press indicates the wound still festers. His past conquests were in the visual mold of his mother, maybe he grew weary and looked elsewhere.

Antidote said...

I'm American, so I know little of these things---but wasn't Charles II an actual negro? With boot lips, kinky hair, etc? So this has all happened before.

charline said...

Je n'avais pas penser à cela, c'est vrai qu'en y regardant bien, le prince Charles a plus le standard de la mocheté que de la beauté, curieusement en vieillissant il y a un mieux!

Anonymous said...

I'm don't agree with the Royal family system itself, some good points made, but it was spoiled by some offensive descriptions about Megan and to women in general. Such as'36 year old burnt out ovaries' and 'past sell by date.' Reeks of sexism and misogyny. I can't see writers name so guess it's a young male (or middle aged) who has a horrible distorted view on women. Can't bekieve I'm still reading this shite against women in the 21st C. Feeling sick.

Anonymous said...

Don't bring your pointless feels here. Read this:

Starting at about age 32, a woman’s chances of conceiving decrease gradually but significantly. From age 35, the fertility decline speeds up.By age 40, fertility has fallen by half. At 30, the chance of conceiving each month is about 20%. At 40 it’s around 5%.
A woman’s age affects her fertility

Serendapus said...

Despite everyone's "feelings," they have a VERY low chance of lasting. I give them less than two years. She's "charmed" him. She's used. He's infatuated but doesn't know love, yet. Statistically, it's doomed!

Powered by Blogger.