Since becoming the World's richest man through ripping everyone off with substandard software that needs constant updates, Bill Gates has put a lot of time and energy into his charity work. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation spends millions each year holding glitzy cocktail parties where the "great and the good" can sip the finest champagnes while lamenting the poor state of Africa.
But it seems that there has been a sea change in Gates's thinking recently, brought on by the looming threat of out-of-control African population growth that is now projected to increase from one billion to four billion in the 21st century, even overtaking the teeming hordes of Asia.
Now Gates is worried that part of that massive increase in population will find its way to Europe and its delicate people, leading to chaos and disaster. In order to prevent this he is now apparently endorsing a "Fortress Europa" approach.
Speaking in an interview with the German newspaper Welt am Sonntag, he said:
"Germany cannot possibly take in the huge number of people who are wanting to make their way to Europe," adding that, "Europe must make it more difficult for Africans to reach the continent via the current transit routes."
A German government report leaked to the Bild newspaper suggests there could be up to 6.6 million people trying to get into Europe right now, including 2.5 million waiting to cross from North Africa in boats that typically go out a few kilometres before the migrants are picked up by European navies and "ferried" to Europe.
 |
| When the relationship with Bono is perhaps a little too close. |
But how exactly would Gates, in his own words, "make it more difficult for Africans to reach the continent via the current transit routes"?
In his interview he forgot to say. How absent minded of him! But using the powers of logic, it is not too difficult to work out what he is driving at.
Since most of the migrants arriving in Europe are coming by boat, either across the Mediterranean, Aegean, or the Bosporus, the obvious solution is to stop the boats. But how do you do that?
Since most of the migrants arriving in Europe are coming by boat, either across the Mediterranean, Aegean, or the Bosporus, the obvious solution is to stop the boats. But how do you do that?
One method would be to apprehend them and gently tow them back to where they came from. But what would you do if they refuse to cooperate and jump into the water, or are pushed in by their travelling companions?
Could you callously just leave them there to sink or swim, as they look at you with those big sad African eyes? Perhaps an earlier generation of Europeans could steel their hearts to do what was necessary for the greater good of Europe and mankind, but not the soft, emotive people that now staff Europe's navies.
 |
| Africans "hacking" our White altruism, but for how much longer? |
The danger here clearly comes from initiating "human contact" with the migrants. As Stalin said, "One death is a tragedy, a million a mere statistic." So, the obvious solution is to avoid "getting personal" with the migrants and instead deter them and the evil smugglers who profit from them by using submarines, a weapon designed to minimise contact between the user and the victim.
Yes, it is cruel but if Europeans are ever to stem the flood, then deterrence must clearly come from somewhere. Bill Gates must have realised this when he made his comments, otherwise his words are merely empty gibberish, and no one would say that Bill Gates is a stupid man.
He knows what he meant, and his dog whistle signal in this case seems clear: Bill Gates can only mean one thing, a submarine blockade of Africa to prevent a Camp of the Saints scenario that would destroy Europe's demographics, culture and civilisation.
One last point: if this is the kind of thing that rich globalists are saying now, the question has to be asked what will they be saying ten years from now?
