ART SCULPTURE REMOVED BECAUSE IT UNWITTINGLY MOCKED MUSLIMS
Let's just put our cards straight on the table here. The French as a nation don't give a flying fuck about decency. This is the nation, remember, that placed the following painting in its art galleries in the 19th century, at a time when the rest of Europe was still getting hot and flustered over a glimpse of stocking:
Yes, the old, one-eyed hairy monster itself! In close up. And at a time when Queen Victoria was still on the throne.
The French were also the nation who allowed an actual urinal to be venerated in their art galleries as an artwork. Were they taking the piss? You bet!
Then there was the massive buttplug by the Los Angeles "artist" Paul McCarthy that they allowed to be "erected" in one or the squares of Paris:
FFS, that thing could be seen from outer space -- or possibly Uranus, LOL!
So, it's not like the French are ever coy or bashful about anything vulgar, disgusting, or connected to human bodily functions, waste matter, or sexual perversions, no matter how degenerate.
So, it's not like the French are ever coy or bashful about anything vulgar, disgusting, or connected to human bodily functions, waste matter, or sexual perversions, no matter how degenerate.
So it came as a surprise when the Louvre Museum actually refused to show a rather less explicit artwork than this by the Dutch-Jewish artist Joep van Lieshout on the spurious excuse that it was "obscene."
The artwork in question, called "Domestikator," is more abstract than figurative. It stands 12 meters tall and looks vaguely like the figure of a human and an animal, with the human holding the animal "affectionately" from behind.
In this work it is clearly Van Lieshout's intention to "suggest" that the human figure is fucking the animal.
But, so what? Big deal! This is France after all -- a country of degenerates and perverts, where the President is a closet homosexual married to his ex-school teacher.
Also, they are not big on animal welfare either, last time I checked.
So, why would this sculpture be any more of a problem than a giant buttplug or other, much worse works by Van Lieshout, like this disgustingly detailed anus-shape street bar that he came up with a few years ago that didn't cause any waves at the time?
Also, they are not big on animal welfare either, last time I checked.
So, why would this sculpture be any more of a problem than a giant buttplug or other, much worse works by Van Lieshout, like this disgustingly detailed anus-shape street bar that he came up with a few years ago that didn't cause any waves at the time?
There can only be one explanation for the Louvre's sudden unexpected timidity and diffidence, namely the growing power of France's Islamic community.
While the Mullahs approve of the growing degeneracy of the native French, because it weakens them and prepares them for future conquest, they take a dim view of anything that might cast aspersions on their people, such as a giant statue that looks vaguely like a man fucking a goat or a sheep.
While the Mullahs approve of the growing degeneracy of the native French, because it weakens them and prepares them for future conquest, they take a dim view of anything that might cast aspersions on their people, such as a giant statue that looks vaguely like a man fucking a goat or a sheep.
This is because bestiality is extremely common in the countries of origin of Muslim migrants to France. I mean, just watch this video from Afghanistan and tell me how this isn't like a normal Saturday night out for these people.
Then there is this story we ran about some unfortunate Moroccan youths who caught something nasty from a sexually compliant donkey.
Whether one thinks it is justified or not, Muslims and animal sex has become a meme, so having this sculpture in front of the Louvre was definitely going to be "provocative." With dropping attendance due to fears of terrorism, you can see why the Museum cucked out.
Now Van Lieshout's sculpture will be shown at a much less prestigious and popular site, where any resultant terror attacks would only help destroy one of the ugliest buildings in the world -- namely the vile Pompidou Centre -- something for which any true art lover would thank the terrorists.
Whether one thinks it is justified or not, Muslims and animal sex has become a meme, so having this sculpture in front of the Louvre was definitely going to be "provocative." With dropping attendance due to fears of terrorism, you can see why the Museum cucked out.
Now Van Lieshout's sculpture will be shown at a much less prestigious and popular site, where any resultant terror attacks would only help destroy one of the ugliest buildings in the world -- namely the vile Pompidou Centre -- something for which any true art lover would thank the terrorists.
Van Lieshout and his monstrosity at their vile new setting. |
No comments
Post a Comment