Sunday, 6 January 2019

BBC LOSES TO TRAD NEWS: ANTI-BREXIT "LOSER'S VOTE" DEMO FIGURES TURN OUT TO BE FAKE NEWS


You may remember the so-called "People's Vote" (aka the Loser's Vote) demonstration in London back in October last year. Thousands of Brexit-deniers gathered to call for a Second Referendum in the hope of overturning the 2016 referendum to leave the EU -- which would have been obvious grounds for a third referendum.

The globalist media, as usual, hyped this demo to the heavens and did all they could to exaggerate the number of attendees, with numerous news sites repeating the figure of 700,000 attendees.

Here is the BBC at the time:

Protesters seeking a referendum on the final Brexit deal have attended a rally which organisers say was the biggest demonstration of its kind. Young voters led the People's Vote march to London's Parliament Square, which supporters say attracted approximately 700,000 protesters. It also had support from a number of MPs who want a fresh vote. This is something which has already been ruled out by Prime Minister Theresa May. The People's Vote campaign said stewards on the route estimated 700,000 were taking part. The Metropolitan Police said it was not able to estimate the size of the crowd.

You notice how that 700,000 figure is repeated TWICE in quick succession? Classic brainwashing technique. 

Here's the lying Guardian in similar form:

ALMOST 700,000 MARCH TO DEMAND ‘PEOPLE'S VOTE’ ON BREXIT DEAL

by Toby Helm, Michael Savage and Eleni Courea

The centre of London ground to a halt as an estimated 700,000 people from all over the UK marched peacefully on parliament to demand a second referendum on Brexit. It was the biggest outpouring of public opposition to government policy since the anti-Iraq war protest in 2003.

The number who descended on the capital to call for a “people’s vote” exceeded all expectations of both the organisers and police.

Wow, they need three people to write one lying news item!

At the time, we here at Trad News refused to credit such an obviously manipulated and manipulative figure, so we threw in our own guess, a number which we admittedly pulled straight out of our arse:

In a stunning display of media-hyped "repetitive marcher syndrome," around 100,000 people, who usually go on any Left-wing march ("Rapefugees welcome," "hate Drumpf," etc.) have marched through London again, with lots of badly made signs carrying shitty memes.

This time the apparent excuse for this outburst of pointless Left-wing marcherism was the so-called "People's Vote," aka the "Brexit Losers' Vote," by people who supposedly favour Britain remaining a province of the German Cuck Empire of the EU. 

Well, now that actual "official figures" for the demo have been released -- THREE MONTHS!!!! later -- guess who was a LOT closer to the truth? Was it the multi-billion pound media organisations with enormous resources to gather information or shoestring budget Trad News just extracting a number out of our bottoms? 

Actually, we aced it.

Here's a report in former conservative newspaper The Daily Telegraph:

A “historic” march in favour of a second Brexit referendum was attended by just a third of the number that its organisers claimed, according to an official estimate.

A debriefing document prepared by the Greater London Authority put the number of attendees at October's People’s Vote rally at 250,000 - significantly below the campaign group's claim that they were joined by more than 700,000 people.

Last night the group was accused of attempting to mislead politicians and voters about its level of support. 

The BBC and Guardian were literally wrong by 450,000 attendees, while Trad News was just 150,000 shy of the official figure. 

Yes, we are literally THREE TIMES more accurate than the BBC! Although, personally, I think that official figure probably includes a lot of tourists, sightseers, and shoppers of the sort who throng London's streets on any weekend. Take those out and the actual figure would probably be 100,000 like we said it was.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments will be checked for spam, hate speech, and extreme low IQ before being published. I'm sure you understand.