 |
| 'Stralia to do the right thing? |
Thanks to the work of the Alt-Right in constantly publicising the sufferings of White South Africans, the world is finally starting to take notice.
Now, in the latest development, Australia's Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, Peter Dutton, has told parliament about the persecution of White South Africans with a view to offering them fast track refugee status:
"If you look at the footage and read the stories, you hear the accounts, it’s a horrific circumstance they face," Dutton told other MPs. "From what I have seen, they [white South African farmers] need help from a civilised country like ours. We want people who want to come here, abide by our laws, integrate into our society, work hard, not lead a life on welfare. And I think these people deserve special attention and we’re certainly applying that special attention now."
Right now, the measures being considered would benefit White farmers, the so-called Boers, who are suffering horrific attacks on their isolated farms almost every day that typically involve acts of unbelievable savagery. It is thought that the Marxist-Racist ANC government is secretly encouraging these attacks or at least turning a blind eye.
 |
| Dutton, the first Western politician to actually give a fuck about the Boers. |
Dutton told Parliament that he has directed the Home Affairs Department to look into how Boers could be accepted into Australia through refugee, humanitarian, or other visas.
The recent move by the racist South African government to pass a law explicitly targetting South African Whites for land confiscation without compensation, and threats by South Africa's "rising politician" Julius Malema to "cut the throat of Whiteness" has helped highlight just how persecuted White South Africans are.
Dutton also said he was "confident" that Australia could agree a deal with the South African government on this issue. But the truth is it might not be as easy as that.
If Australia grants refugees status to Boer farmers, then it would be difficult to deny refugee status to other White South Africans, who are also racially oppressed by South Africa's racist government. It would also be a clear signal to the World that South Africa was not a "rainbow nation" but instead a deeply racist society.
Right now, many hundreds of thousands of South African Whites are forced to live in impoverished squatter camps because they face racial discrimination in the job market.
Right now, many hundreds of thousands of South African Whites are forced to live in impoverished squatter camps because they face racial discrimination in the job market.
 |
| Whites pushed to the margins of society by the Marxist-Racist government. |
Also, if Australia started taking in White refugees, then other countries might follow Australia's moral lead. This could then lead to a rapid exodus of the country's White population, which of course would cause the South African economy to collapse.
The Black racists who run the country and parasitically profit off White wealth, enterprise, and industry wouldn't want to see that happen.
The hope is that they will be too stupid to realise this and thus allow White South Africans to escape to Australia and other countries. This would then give Blacks the full opportunity to turn their country into another Haiti, or "shithole" country as Trump would say.
The hope is that they will be too stupid to realise this and thus allow White South Africans to escape to Australia and other countries. This would then give Blacks the full opportunity to turn their country into another Haiti, or "shithole" country as Trump would say.
I don't understand this.
ReplyDeleteShouldn't Holland be forced to take the Boers?
Boers are Dutch, so they should back to Holland.
When the French empire fell, the French went back to France.
When the British empire fell,the Brits went back to UK.
When Japanese empire fell, Japanese went back to Japan.
So, why won't Holland take back the Boers? Do they see their own kind as the Other and see blacks and Muslims as New Dutchmen?
It's not quite so straightforward. The first settlers at the Cape in the seventeenth century were a mixture of Dutch with Huguenot refugees from France. Over the next three centuries they developed into a distinct ethnicity - the Afrikaners, or "Boers" - with their own language, Afrikaans, which is derived from Dutch but now exists in its own right. It would be a bit like asking that Americans should go back to England.
ReplyDeleteWhy would there be a problem at all with this policy, even if many other whites who aren't Dutch/French Boer Afrikaners were included? All white citizens of South Africa were part of the British Commonwealth and should be given special refugee status immigration consideration by Australia or any other Commonwealth country. Just ensure that the policy specifies white refugees only. Let the blacks have their newly remade South African s***hole Wakanda. And a special benefit to Australia is that they could claim they've met their immigrant quotas and can't except anymore Moslems, either.
ReplyDeleteAfrikaner aren't 'Cape Dutch' anymore, they are the only European nation to have put down independent roots on the African continent (older than the USA in fact). And by some interbreeding with the Khoe-San aborigines, they can even claim a 200,000 year legacy in the same region, which the Bantu who exterminated their Khoe-San cannot. But the Afrikaners' backs are to the sea and they have nowhere else to go except into a homeless diaspora. What they really need is assistance to stay put in the life they have made on the land they have made. At the very least, some form of territorial devolution like the Zulus negotiated for KwaZulu-Natal. Otherwise, secession.
ReplyDelete