Tuesday, 13 February 2018

TWITTER LOSES ITS SHIT OVER NEHLEN'S "CHEDDAR MEG" TWEET

The gently amusing image that got a senatorial candidate banned from the increasingly Soviet-style social media monopoly giant Twitter.
Revealing the degree to which race is increasingly becoming a polarising issue in America, social media monopoly giant Twitter has banned Wisconsin GOP candidate Paul Nehlen from its platform after the increasingly red-pilled senatorial candidate posted a picture of Cheddar Man superimposed on the face of Prince Harry's bride-to-be Meghan Markle. Nehlen captioned the post, “Honey, does this tie make my face look pale?”

The image, which has gone viral and was only shared by Nehlen, is a witty comment on the weird synergy that seems to exist between the first partially Black person to marry into the UK Royal Family and the highly speculative news story that Cheddar Man, an ancient inhabitant of Britain from 10,000 years ago, may possibly have had darker skin than previously thought.

The notion that an ancient ancestor of the British people may have been "black" -- or at least "dark" -- can legitimately be seen as a piece of propaganda designed to overcome opposition to Prince Harry's race-mixing marriage, which is being used to normalise a narrative of racial replacement aimed at the indigenous British people, who have been victims of mass immigration and Third World colonization for decades. 

Although suppressed under a politically correct narrative that focuses on Markle as a supposedly "wonderful individual," many Britons nevertheless feel deep concerns about the threat to their collective identity that such a marriage poses. This is because the Royal Family is considered to be a symbol of traditional British identity. Indeed, without fulfilling that function, it is difficult to see what other purpose or reason the Royal Family has for existing.

In view of this, the meme of Markle with the face of the Cheddar Man is an incisive and witty comment, and cannot in any way be categorised as "hateful" or "obscene." In short, there are no grounds on which to legitimately ban the meme, let alone "de-Twitter" anyone who posts it, as Nehlen has done.

The fact the Twitter has overreacted in this extreme way shows the "Sovietization" of big social media in the United States. 

This move also means that Twitter has effectively branded itself as being an anti-free-speech platform, at the very same time that Alt-tech is creating viable, pro-free-speech platforms to compete with it, like Gab.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments will be checked for spam, hate speech, and extreme low IQ before being published. I'm sure you understand.