We all know the vast majority gays didn't even want "gay marriage," and that they only pushed for it because they are inveterate drama queens who enjoyed maliciously weaponizing conservative normies' own morality against them.
But now it looks like the rollback has begun, with the Atlantic island of Bermuda becoming the first territory to grant gay marriage and then think, "Um, er...maybe not a good idea."
In what looks like a clear case of the Bermuda Triangle defeating the pink triangle, on Friday (15th Dec.) Bermuda's House of Assembly voted to pass the Domestic Partnership Act. The new law overturns a six-month-old judicial decision that legalised gay marriage over the declared wishes of the vast majority of the islands's population. In 2016 a referendum on the issue saw over 68% of voters rejecting same-sex marriage.
The new act also defines marriage as only being between a man and a woman.
The comparatively small number of gays who want to opt out of the rampant and often heavily promiscuous gay lifestyle will still be allowed to enter so-called "domestic partnerships" and have some rights as couples, but they won't be able to claim that they are married. Only those gays who married during the six-month period when gay marriage was "legal" will be able to describe themselves as married. There are no statistics on how many people this involves if any.
Bermuda is a largely Christian territory in which most of the population identifies as Black, although Bermudan Blacks are in fact largely mulatto. Around 30% of the population also identify as White.
 |
| Uppity White man (with a tan?) telling God-fearing, based Black people to accept gay marriage. |
What makes this decision more interesting is that the anti-homosexualist party is actually the Centre-Left Progressive Labour Party, while the opposition centre-right, cuckservative One Bermuda Alliance (OBA), which gets more support from the White community, is the main party pushing for gay marriage.
OBA senator Andrew Simons, who is not Black or mulatto, said during the Upper House debate that the issue was “bigger than politics,” adding that the Bill was “an affront to people’s dignity.
OBA senator Andrew Simons, who is not Black or mulatto, said during the Upper House debate that the issue was “bigger than politics,” adding that the Bill was “an affront to people’s dignity.
"As human beings we should have the ability to enter into a marriage between two people who love each other and this relationship should be recognised by the state," he said, using the same inverted normie tropes that gay marriage campaigners everywhere use to attack traditional marriage. "If we accept this Bill in this House, then we are taking rights away from people, yadda yadda yadda..."
These words by Simons look disturbingly like another tragic case of a racist White man talking down to based Blacks for defending the natural order. Stay strong Black Bermudans and don't let Whitey gay-up your wonderful island paradise.
 |
| Non-gay Bermudan dolphins celebrate the historic decision. |
"As human beings we should have the ability to enter into a marriage..." Homos always had this right, it simply had to be someone of the opposite gender. So they have indeed, despite their protests otherwise, "redefined" marriage. Marriage is sanctified by society and government for one reason only: To encourage stable pairings that produce offspring. The leftist argument that not all marriages result in children, or should infertile people be prohibited from marrying is a specious argument. Yes, no one forces married people to have children, and there are some who simply cannot. But the majority of married couples DO. A couple of queers promising to remain monogamous does not produce a big enough benefit to society that we should invest in enshrining and protecting it. Heterosexual couples and their ability to continue the nation's race do produce a big enough benefit for us to invest it as an institution.
ReplyDelete