TOP SHOP CUCKS TO TRANNY, ABOLISHES MALE & FEMALE CHANGING ROOMS

Who would win?

One of the biggest clothes retailers in the UK, with 550 stores across the country, and a further 350 overseas

OR 

One stroppy tranny on a shopping trip?

Do we even need to ask? Of course the tranny, because we live in an age when any confused freak claiming victim status can force any company or institution to bend over backwards to accommodate, validate, and normalise their mental illness.  

After tranny and "performance artist" Travis Alabanza (see above), a man who identifies as female, was refused admission to Top Shop's female changing rooms in their Manchester store, he promptly took to social media to rage about "muh oppression," tweeting:

"Hey @topshop just experienced transphobia in your Manchester store. Not letting me use the changing room....sort it out"

The result was that Top Shop immediately cucked and even backdated their cucking, saying that all the changing rooms at their 550 Top Shop shops and Top Man shops in the UK were already gender neutral and that the company had recently changed its policy. 

A spokesman for the company, which is owned by Jewish billionaire Sir Philip Green said: 

"All Topshop and Topman customers are free to use any of the fitting rooms located within our stores."

Really, from a business point of view, this is win-win for the company. 

If all their toilets and changing rooms are "gender neutral" it means a massive saving in floor space and rents. Shops only need one toilet and one set of changing rooms. As for all the female customers freaked out by having to change with big hairy men and creepy perverts peering round the curtains, you can just shame them into compliance by accusing them of being transphobic, hate-filled bigots. 

It also lets the company off the hook from the growing number of frankly messed up people who now have confused gender identity syndrome, an illness that seems to be spreading like the plague. 

But, also, if they didn't "morally signal" about how tranny-friendly they are, they might have to "morally signal" instead about how they don't source their clothes from sweatshop factories in the Far East, employing virtual slave labour. 

But that kind of virtue would obviously cut into the enormous profits of Sir Philip Green and the other shareholders.