A CROATION KRAMPUS KILLS HIMSELF IN COURT

Slobodan Praljak, a Croatian hero from the ethnic wars in Yugoslavia, committed suicide in court by drinking poison while a judge from the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia gave out the decision that his unjust 20-year sentence would be upheld.

Upon hearing the guilty verdict upheld, Praljak responded that he rejected the verdict of the court because they are a bunch of kebab-loving pussies. He then drank poison (apparently a sort of Bosnian soup) from a bottle, immediately becoming ill and dying a few hours late.

Praljak's last words after hearing his conviction:
 

"Judges, Slobodan Praljak is not a war criminal. With disdain I reject your verdict!"

Dramatically, he concluded:
 

"This is poison that I drank."

Praljak became "notorious" to the globalist media for ordering the destruction of Mostar's iconic Stari Most ("Old Bridge"), 24 years ago, during the Bosnian War, and this is the real reason he was put on trial. Symbolism, you see, is important, and to globalists, bridges are almost "fetish objects." 

But the truth is Praljak's action was done for the humanitarian purpose of separating populations that were clearly having trouble living together. 

Separating such populations, who are in the habit of murdering each other, is usually given the pejorative name of "ethnic cleansing" by the globalist media. But a better case could be made that Praljak's action saved lives on both sides.

At this time of year, we can see Praljak as one of the personifications of Krampus—the folkloric figure who, during the Christmas season, is sent to disrupt the complacency of the "well-behaved" and punish the naughty. 

Praljak's act has dramatically put an end to the smug satisfaction of the liberal news media circus, and highlighted their complacency and stupidity about the wars that followed the disintegration of Yugoslavia.

As for Trad News, we salute this hero, who acted to save his people. Let us hope that the criminals who drove him to his death will have their own day in court.

TRUMP DECLARES "HOLY JIHAD" AGAINST EUROPE'S MUSLIM INVADERS WITH SAVAGE RETWEETS

After having his "Total Muslim Ban" watered down by cucks in the US legal system, President Trump has found a new way to hit back at the Muslim menace that is currently threatening to destroy the Christian World. He did this by retweeting three videos from Jayda Franssen, deputy leader of "Britain First" a small, pro-Christian nationalist party in the UK.

The tweets are effectively a declaration of "Holy Christian Jihad" against the Islamic hordes, because they show the extremely negative effects of mass Muslim migration into European countries. 

In one video, a sinister bearded man destroys a statue of the Virgin Mary, while in another a gang of Muslims beat a crippled Dutch boy for no other reason than he is a Christian and they are in his country. Another video showed Muslims in a Muslim country killing a homosexual.

VIDEO: Muslim migrant beats up Dutch boy on crutches! pic.twitter.com/11LgbfFJDq

— Jayda Fransen (@JaydaBF) November 28, 2017

Critics have claimed that one or more of the videos may in fact be fake, having been produced in order to stoke up fears and emotions in order to promote fund-raising by anti-Islamic campaigners. 

Modern-day Boadicea Jayda Franssen

The White House responded to such criticisms by saying that it wouldn't really matter if the videos were fake as there is enough evidence to suggest that Muslims are in fact destroying Christian imagery, conducting violent attacks on Europeans, and killing homosexuals on a significant scale.

'Whether it is a real video, the threat is real,' White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters outside the West Wing. 

Meanwhile in the UK, Britcucks immediately took to the streets and the airwaves to show their fealty to their Muslim overlords.

Demonstrators gathered outside the Prime Minister's residence in Downing Street, holding placards denouncing Trump, while the British Prime Minister released a statement, saying, "It is wrong for President Trump to have done this."

Prime Minister May begs forgiveness from her Islamic masters.

One of Trump's most vocal critics was Piers Morgan, a disgraced former newspaper editor and TV celebrity of Irish Catholic orogin. Morgan, who was born, Piers O'Meara, denounced Trump in particularly strong terms, writing his comments in the second person in a pathetic attempt to imply that Trump actually reads his articles (LOL):

"Mr President, please do not underestimate the enormity of what you did today. You’re the most powerful person on earth, and your words carry huge weight, as do your retweets. You have now effectively told all the world’s bigots, racists, Islamophobes and white supremacists that you’re with them, that they’re YOUR kind of people...You might as well have addressed the American people from the Oval Office with a Ku Klux Klan hat on...Mr Trump, this is the worst thing you have done as President. I urge you to immediately undo those three re-tweets, and apologize unreservedly. That won’t repair the terrible damage you’ve done. But it will at least acknowledge that you understand just how wrong it was. If you don’t, we will be left to assume that you too are a hateful Islamophobe and racist. Are you, Mr President?"

While some may see this as an attempt by Morgan to win the much coveted "Cuck of the Year" award, the real story here is that Morgan has been White knighting for Trump for years in the hope that Trump would notice him and grant him special access. Morgan is clearly bitter that "senpai hasn't noticed him" and is clearly throwing a fit as a consequence.

As for the rest of the West, we are more like...

MILO DEMANDS MUSLIMS LEAVE AUSTRALIA SO HE CAN KEEP ON FELLATING NEGROES

Controversial T-shirt seller Milo Yiannopoulos was at the centre of another media storm after he told a Lebanese-Australian journalist that all Muslims should be deported from Australia and the West in general.

Milo made the comment in Australia, where he is on tour, during an interview with Emma Eros. Despite her unlikely name and the fact that she was dressed like a cheap slapper looking for a pump and dump, Ms. Eros claimed to be a practising Muslim. However, when quizzed by Milo about Islam, she showed little real knowledge of the popular Middle Eastern faith founded by Mohammed in the 7th century.

"Expel Islam from the West," Milo said. "Anyone who describes themselves as a Muslim, send them back to the Middle East. If you describe yourself as a Muslim, if you believe in the precepts of Islam, all the things Islam seems to produce in those countries, I think you should go." 

There are many reasons to oppose Islamic colonization of the West, for example:

1. Deeply divided societies

2. An influx of lower IQ people

3. Terrorism and murderous violence

4. A sharp decline in intellectual culture
5. Sharia no-go zones

6. The banning of alcohol and pork products

7. Cruel methods of animal slaughter

8. Cruelty to dogs

9. Child rape gangs

10. The replacement and extinction of the original inhabitants...etc., etc.

Milo's motivation, however, is thought to include none of the above. His main reason for wishing to expel millions of Muslims from the West is because he fears that they may interfere with his freedom to suck Black cock, an activity that he has often expressed enthusiasm for. 

While the Koran and the example of the Prophet Mohammed's own life allow rape, slavery, certain kinds of murder, and pedophilia, one of the many things it frowns on is gay sex.

However, it is wrong to see Islam and the nihilistic hedonism that Milo represents as opposing forces. In fact, they are symbiotic. This is because any society that falls pray to the extreme Libertarianism and atomised hedonism that Milo favours will inevitably have plummeting birth rates, weakened ideological defences, and a confused collective identity that provides the prefect conditions for Islamic colonisation.

LIBERTY GB CALLS IT A DAY

Liberty GB, the British nationalist party founded by Paul Weston and George Whale in 2013, has decided to call it a day, according to a statement released by the party's chairman Paul Weston. 

The reasons given for closing the party down was it failure to grow significantly and the emergence of a new party, For Britain, which will cover the same nationalist-lite anti-Islamic territory that Liberty GB staked out. 

During the four and a half years of its existence, the party had a number of minor high points, including the arrest of Weston on the 26th of April 2014, simply for quoting from a speech by Churchill, an action that highlighted the incompatibility of the new multiracial and politically correct UK with the country's entire history. 

Another high point was Jack Buckby's candidacy in the Batley and Spen by-election caused by the murder of the sitting MP Jo Cox. Buckby did this to protest collusion between the main parties, as the other parties decided not to contest the seat, and to emphasise the fact that Britain's political system offers voters little real choice.

Given the present abysmal state of the UK, the party should have done a lot better.

The full statement released by Paul Weston and the Executive Council of Liberty GB reads as follows:

We will be asking the Electoral Commission to officially deregister Liberty GB at the end of December 2017.

The reasons for the decision are threefold:

(i). Liberty GB has not grown as we hoped and expected it would.
(ii). The patriotic anti-Islamisation movement in Britain is grotesquely fragmented, with new organisations springing up all the time. This is doubtless part of the reason our movement has been ineffectual compared with similar movements in Europe. It is critical at this stage to create a clear focal point for the political struggle.
(iii). We believe Anne Marie Waters' recently launched party, For Britain, can best provide that focal point. For Britain occupies much the same political ground as Liberty GB and presently has the momentum, following Anne Marie's recent UKIP leadership bid. Certainly, it makes little sense to have two similar parties competing.

We realise that many of our members will be disappointed, but we see this as a positive move to help consolidate the anti-Islamisation movement in Britain.

We would like to thank everyone who has supported Liberty GB over the past five years, enabling us to communicate our message to huge numbers of people. Though we don't have elected officials, our online presence via the website, Facebook page and YouTube channel has informed and influenced many, and a proportion of them will doubtless continue the fight through other organisations.

Any funds remaining in the party account after paying remaining bills will be donated to For Britain.

The Liberty GB website www.libertygb.org.uk will remain online for at least a year, providing an archive of the hundreds of excellent articles submitted by our writers (to access / search them, go to News->Search Articles). This will allow time for readers to back up favourite articles, and for writers to post them elsewhere, if they so wish. Note that the website and Facebook page www.facebook.com/LibertyGBParty have been included in the UK Web Archive at www.webarchive.org.uk.

Also, the YouTube channel www.youtube.com/channel/UClCJ4KEsWkhzvvxftRf0FYw will be maintained indefinitely, being the most comprehensive archive of Paul Weston's speeches and interviews. He hasn't yet decided whether he'll continue posting videos there, so the best bet for now is to follow him on Twitter @paulwestonlibgb.

Paul Weston will be joining Anne Marie Waters' party​, For Britain, so you haven't heard the last of him! He recommends Liberty GB members and supporters to do likewise, so we can begin building a movement with the necessary critical mass to change Britain's disastrous present course, and to avert demographic replacement and Islamisation.

Again, thank you all for your tremendous support, patriotism and friendship over the past five years.

SURVIVED IN-BOMBING TO DIE OF IN-BREEDING?

Not all Muslims, bro...

Most people die unmentioned and forgotten, but in the case of Zara Ahmed, an 18-year-old nobody who died suddenly of a mysterious diabetes condition, the mainstream media sniffed something that could further one of the favoured narratives. You know, the one about Islam being the religion of peace, Muslims being nice people, and Muslim terrorists not being "real Muslims." For convenience let's call it the "hug a Muslim narrative."

Accordingly, the meagre facts of Zara's life -- university student, Muslim, attendee of the Ariana Grande concert in Manchester where 22 people were killed -- were worked up by newspapers like the Manchester Evening News into a heart-warming narrative designed to remind us that "we are all on the same side" when it comes to terrorism, which is just "nasty, hateful people" and "nothing whatsoever to do with race, religion, and culture."

A university student who had been at the Ariana Grande concert on the night of the Manchester Arena terror attack has died after complications with diabetes.

Young music fan Zara Ahmed, 18, escaped unhurt from the May 22 attack on the indoor stadium but was left deeply affected by the tragedy.

Following the tragedy, her family say the university student was determined to live life to the full and show the world the positive aspects of her Muslim faith.

But she died tragically young after passing away at her halls of residence at Liverpool’s John Moores University, where she was studying forensic science.

Her family say the devoted Ariana Grande fan, from Kinmel Bay in Wales, “held onto her faith and never hid it from others.”

Yes, this story is designed to get us feeling nice feels about Muslims and to not worry in the least about their booming demographics and deeply tribal and often violent culture. 

But while it's nice that Zara wasn't a terrorist and it's "strangely comforting" that she could have been blown up along with a lot of White people by another Muslim (in-bombing, I guess you could call it), the fact that she died so young is not entirely neutral either. 

British Muslims, like Zara, are well known for "consanguinity," which means cousin marriage and is often referred to as "in-breeding." This is also linked to a wide range of serious health problems, including diabetes.

Although we don't know much about Zara's personal situation or how closely related her parents are, the fact that an 18-year-old girl, who was unharmed by the bomb attack in Manchester, should just keel over and die "after complications with diabetes" points to the kind of weird health problems caused by in-breeding.

Genetic diseases like this are just another of the many blessings of the "Religion of Peace" that we are expected to welcome into our lands without so much as a murmur of displeasure.

According to Science Daily, there are 325,000 Muslims (out of a population of around 3 million) who have diabetes in the UK, with the illness being four times more common in the Muslim Bangladeshi and Pakistani groups than the general UK population. 

While some of this is no doubt connected to lifestyle, which is another issue altogether, much of it is the result of genetic problems caused by in-breeding. 

What was Ms. Ahmed's family lineage, and was cousin marriage a major factor in it? If the media are going to force us to consider her life at all, then these are clearly facts we need to be told. Why the cover up?

GINGER PRINCE TO MARRY "ETHNIC" BRIDE IN DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO UNIFY MULTICULTURAL BRITAIN

In a desperate attempt to unify an increasingly divided and fractious, multicultural Britain, Prince Harry, Queen Elizabeth's ginger-haired grandson, has been tasked with marrying an ethnic minority woman. 

The woman in question is African-American, Meghan Markle, a well-past-her-sell-by-date divorcee, who, at 36, is three years older than Harry, who doesn't have a proper job and is technically a NEET. 

The bride-to-be was formerly married to a US movie producer for two years, but they divorced due to "irreconcilable differences," which probably had something to do with his casting couch duties in Hollywood. Markle herself is a bit-part actress and is known to have had several boyfriends.

Harry's future bride before she started
 using hair-straightening products.

Although it is laudable of Prince Harry to marry a burnt-out 36-year-old cougar, who has been riding the cock carousel for decades, in order to get a bit of "diversity" into the "hideously White" and "heavily German" Royal Family, Markle is a poor choice as she lacks a "high ethnic quotient." 

Although born to a White father and a Black mother, her mother was a university professor, which means she probably had a considerable amount of White blood too. Ms. Markle is therefore genetically much Whiter than Black, and "presents" as near-White with her rather fine features, artificially straightened hair, and Miss-Selfridge-tier fashion choices. 

Although it is unlikely that she will be able to easily produce many children with her burnt-out, 36-year-old ovaries, any offspring that ensue will be even Whiter than her, losing the whole point of marrying an ethnic, which is to make the Royal Family look truly diverse -- all the better to represent multicultural Britain. 

Harry would have been better advised to have married one of these:

Personally I'd go for the one in the middle, despite the heavy use of make-up, which is never a good sign...

But the bottom line here is that this marriage will satisfy no one. Purists who think the Royal Family should only marry fellow Germans will be incensed. But at the same time progressives who think the Royal Family should reflect the "rich diversity" of multicultural Britain -- rather like the police force -- will also be deeply disappointed that the Prince is wedding such a Whitish non-White, and also one that is likely to have few if any children. 

As for Britain's ethnic minorities, they will continue to see the Royal Family as White people, while many of them will continue to feel alienated, hateful, and resentful against Britain -- but not enough to leave.

ALJAZEERA HATEMONGER ATTACKS KINDLY OLD ASIAN MAN FOR PRAISING JEWS

Bigot and obvious Jew-hater Mehdi Hasan, an anchor man for Al Jazeera TV, viciously attacked a nice old Asian man on his TV show, after the elderly man dared to praise the Jews for their many accomplishments. 

The 92-year-old man, Mahathir Mohamad who was Prime Minister of Malaysia for over 20 years, was ostensibly a guest on hatemonger Hasan's show. But "Hitler-worshipper" Hasan angrily brought up some comments Mahathir had made about Jews in 2003, when he expressed his deep respect and awe for the intelligence, tenacity, and enormous influence of the Jewish people:

"The Europeans killed 6 million Jews out of 12 million. But today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them. We are up against a people who think. They survived 2,000 years of pogroms, not by hitting back but by thinking. They invented and successfully promoted socialism, communism, human rights and democracy so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong, so they may enjoy equal rights with others. With these, they have now gained control of the most powerful countries and they, this tiny community, have become a world power."

Hasan, who once thought about naming all his children after Himmler, then demanded that Mahathir retract these highly positive words, something Mahathir refused to do:

"I believe I am speaking the truth. You look at America. It is totally dedicated to supporting Israel, even when Israel commits international crime, Indeed candidates for election need to inform the Jewish lobby that they are supporting Israel."

These remarks incensed Hasan, who then proceeded to flare up like one of the many ovens in Auschwitz. He denounced Mahathir's praise of the Jews as "outrageous" and, in an insane twist, even called him "anti-Semitic" -- an obvious act of anti-Jewish projection. Despite this, Mahathir maintained his composure and continued to heap praise on the Jews:

"There are not very many Jews in this World. By themselves they cannot rule this world, but they can influence countries to do the work for them, and America is very much under Jewish influence."

NARCO WARS: TRUMP BOMBS TALIBAN DRUG FACTORIES

Afghan children gathering opium pods.

The Trump administration, which has been slowly losing the war in Afghanistan, has decided to up the stakes by expressly targetting Taliban drug facilities. In the past the US only used air strikes when under direct attack by Taliban. 

This is a highly dangerous move that could upset the delicate balance of tribal loyalties and piss off a lot of hard-assed Afghani tribesmen, who might then decide that the Taliban have a point after all. 

According to the Washington Post (no link as it is paywall), the Pentagon unleashed F-22 Raptor stealth fighters, B-52 bombers, and Afghan A-29 Super Tucanos to bomb narcotic production facilities in the South of the country. The operation, designed to hit Taliban revenue streams, started on Sunday (19th November) and continued into Monday. 

"This represents the first significant use of new legal authorities granted by the Trump administration in August that enable the Pentagon to target Taliban revenue streams, said Army Gen. John W. Nicholson Jr., the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan.

Previously, the U.S. military conducted strikes only when facing imminent threat or working directly with the Afghans.

Nicholson said, the F-22 “was used because of its ability to deliver precision munitions — in this case, a 250-pound bomb, small-diameter, that causes the minimal amount of collateral damage.” The objective for more precise munitions comes at a time where civilian deaths in U.S. airstrikes have been heavily scrutinized. Earlier this month, U.S. airstrikes in the region killed ‘at least 13 civilians’ in a bombing raid."

According to the Drug Enforcement Administration, there are up to 500 narcotic production facilities across Afghanistan, with 90% of the world's heroin being produced there. The air strikes are believed to have destroyed or partially damaged around ten drug labs. No doubt the other 490 will have little trouble taking up the slack.

An F-22, $150 million per plane, plus $50,000 per flying hour.

US intervention in Afghanistan has been an expensive disaster, with opium production soaring ever since, as the military action has disrupted the economy. 

Before the US invasion in 2001, the Taliban, which controlled most of the country, had banned the growing of opium poppies, leading to a massive fall in drug production. In fact, this was one of the reason it was comparatively easy for US-backed forces to topple the Taliban -- their hard line on drugs had made them many enemies. They have since reversed this policy, in order to finance their "holy war" against the "infidel invader."

Now the US seems to be repeating the mistakes made by the Taliban back then, with a policy that is (a) largely ineffective, as drug labs can easily be set up anywhere and embedded in the civilian population, and (b) guaranteed to antagonise a lot of neutral Afghanis who view the opium industry as the only way to provide for their families.   

TRUMP WIPES HIS ARSE WITH TIME MAGAZINE (FIGURATIVELY SPEAKING AS TOILET PAPER IS BETTER )

Time Magazine is a good contender for worst magazine in the world. It's bland, middle-brow, dentists-waiting-room style makes whatever it reports on sound like old, boring fake news. Essentially it is to news and comment what Reader's Digest is to cutting edge literature -- suitable for your granny. In fact it's been like that since anyone can remember.

It is the quintessential Boomer mag. But now even Trump, who is, in a sense, the ultimate boomer, seems to have lost all respect for it, Tweeting out his contempt, after the magazine approached him about being its "Man of the Year":

Time Magazine called to say that I was PROBABLY going to be named “Man (Person) of the Year,” like last year, but I would have to agree to an interview and a major photo shoot. I said probably is no good and took a pass. Thanks anyway!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 24, 2017

This is pretty funny as Trump used to make a big thing about being on the cover of Time Magazine. So, what is going on here? 

On Trump's side, he probably feels that he has helped boost the magazine in the past to the Boomers who frequent his hotels and cold clubs, but that the magazine has been dismissive of him, running negative articles like the rest of the liberal dominated media.

But what about Time Magazine? Why are they so keen to have Trump on the cover as "Man of the Year" one year after he was on the cover as...um..."Man of the Year"? 

Well, a lot of this has to do with money, as the magazine is about to be sold to a media corporation in which the Koch brothers are heavily involved. 

The synergy here is that Trump is the most "climate change denial" President to ever sit in the White House, while the Koch brothers have enormous capital invested in the oil and gas industries. 

Yes, it looks like the editors at Time were getting ready to suck up to the new owners by reaching out to Trump, but Trump wasn't having any of it. Expect root and branch "editorial restructuring" once the Time deal goes through. And who will be Time's Man of the Year? Probably Donald Trump, but I think this guy also has a good chance:

ARGENTINE SUB INVOLVED IN "UNSCHEDULED UNDERSEA TERRITORIAL ACQUISITION"

In the latest heroic achievement of the Argentinian armed forces, a navy submarine has successfully laid claim to a portion of the South Atlantic seabed.

The submarine, the San Juan, with its crew of 44, marked its possession of the new underwater domain by spontaneously exploding and scattering the area with its debris. 

The submarine seized the territory, which had formerly belonged to King Neptune, after sailing from the Ushuaia naval base in the extreme South of Argentina and then skirting the Falkland Islands, a territory which Argentina administered for a brief period in the 1980s. 

It was during this period that the Argentinian government first experimented with "underwater colonisation" on a large scale.

The new sub-aquatic province is located around 200 miles from the coast of Argentina and 200 miles North of the Falkland Islands, which is now home to a small British garrison. 

The watery province measures several hundred square meters and is mainly inhabited by fish and few deep sea crabs, who are reportedly doing extremely well out of the new political arrangement. 

Meanwhile, back on the Argentine mainland the government has come under criticism for its expansionary policy, with the relatives of the submariners involved in the "unscheduled undersea territorial acquisition" accusing the government of sacrificing the welfare of the crew in an attempt to project political and military power well beyond the humble limits and military capability of the frequently debt-riden Latin American nation. 

BRITAIN TO PAY BREXIT BLACKMAIL BILLIONS TO SAVE UK FINANCIAL CENTRE

Britain, which has been paying billions into the EU for decades, is now facing a rising blackmail bill as it seeks to exit the over-centralised bureaucratic transnational monstrosity.

Now it has been revealed by the Office For Budget Responsibility (OBR), a government body set up to provide accurate financial data, that Britain will have to pay at least another £28 billion to Brussels in the two years AFTER it has officially left the EU in March 2019.

This is because British Prime Minister Theresa May has offered to pay into the EU Budget annually until its current funding period ends in 2021. This means that Britain will be paying into the EU budget in 2020 and 2021, years in which it will be OUTSIDE!!!! the EU and unable to receive any of the meagre benefits of membership.

The OBR has estimated the costs as £13.8 billion in 2019/20 and £14 billion in 2020/21.

This £28 billion figure is also just an initial offer and does not include extra money demanded by the EU to start trade talks. This is thought to be another £20 billion. EU head Jean-Claude Juncker likened the trade talks demand to buying a round of drinks for everyone:

"If you are sitting in a bar and ordering 28 beers and then suddenly one of your colleagues is leaving and is not paying, that is not feasible. They have to pay."

The soaring Brexit bill, which is now near £50 billion and set to rise means that the UK government will have to find more money by cutting even more services for the British public, something that will push down the popularity of May's Conservative government and practically ensure a period of Labour rule under the extreme Leftist Jeremy Corbyn.

But just why is the UK being so weak against the EU? After all, this is a two-way-street and it is clearly in the interests of Europe to maintain good relations with the UK, which is a net importer of EU-made goods. 

The secret here is that London's financial centre, the City of London, is the UK's Achilles Heel. An abrupt break with the EU could see the EU imposing various restrictions on financial transactions that would destroy the City of London's role as a global financial capital, and instead favour Paris or Frankfurt. Indeed, this could happen anyway, and probably will once the EU has used its threats to extract as much as possible out of the UK.

But even though the UK government is bending over backwards and ready to pay out a fortune in a forlorn attempt to protect the interests of the City of London, it is not the City of London that will pick up the bill. Of course not. Instead it will be the average, hard-working UK taxpayer. Once again more Lemon socialism -- the privatisation of profits and the socialisation of losses. 

PANIC ON THE STREETS OF LONDON

Central London was swept by a mass panic attack early Friday evening (24th), with armed police responding to what hysterical Londoners claimed was a terrorist shooting incident. 

The panic started after an argument between a Black man and a White man in a London tube station caused noises that convinced some people a terrorist shooting attack was under way. 

This is it. This is literally the official story at the moment. Here is the BBC report:

Armed police have been stood down and two central London Underground stations have reopened following reports of gunshots being fired at Oxford Circus. Police want to speak to two men after an altercation "erupted" on a platform at the station, but say there is no evidence any weapons had been fired. Officers also want to speak to anyone who was at the station about the cause of the mass panic and evacuation. Sixteen people were treated after they were injured fleeing the station. Oxford Circus was closed and armed police were deployed following reports that gunshots had been heard inside the station. Police initially treated the incident as potentially terrorism-related, while nearby Bond Street station was closed amid fears of overcrowding. The British Transport Police (BTP) said officers believe there was an altercation between two men on the platform before the scare. They have released CCTV images of two men they want to speak to.

How can an altercation between two men sound like guns being shot? There are two possibilities, neither of them good. 

One is that shots were fired and there was a terrorist attack or attempted terrorist attack of some kind, but that police decided to cover it up or downplay it. Maybe the altercation between the two men was actually a police office wrestling a gun out of the hand of jihadi nutjob. 

The other is that the funny Black guy from the Police Academy movies was in town:

Obviously people in London are not taking London Mayor Sadiq Khan's advice to just treat terrorism as "part and parcel of life in any big city." Instead they are living in a constant state of fear, trepidation, and near panic that can be effortlessly triggered by men shouting in an echoey tunnel, children's firecrackers, or someone dropping a box. 

This what a cucked city looks like.

16 people were injured in the stampede. That could have been a lot worse. 

What this means is that terrorists now have a comparatively easy way to attack our cities and one that it will be difficult to jail them for, namely walking around making loud noises in crowded places. 

FRANKEN INAPPROPRIATELY TOUCHES OWN HEAD AFTER MORE ACCUSATIONS OF ASS-GRABBING

Confusion: Groper and Groyper

Embattled Senator Al Franken has "inappropriately touched" his head (photo: left), after two more women joined the ranks of those accusing the Democrat politician of being a butt-n-boobs grabbing sex pervert. 

As reported by Huffpo:

Two more women have told HuffPost that Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) touched their butts in separate incidents. These are the third and fourth such allegations against Franken in the past week. Leeann Tweeden, a radio host, wrote last week that Franken had kissed and groped her without her consent during a 2006 USO tour. On Monday, Lindsay Menz accused Franken of groping her at the Minnesota State Fair in 2010.

The two additional women, who said they were not familiar with each others’ stories, both spoke on condition of anonymity. But their stories, which describe events during Franken’s first campaign for the Senate, are remarkably similar — and both women have been telling them privately for years.

The head touching by Franken is considered inappropriate for two main reasons. 

Firstly, as a disgusting, sex-mad groper, the only part of his body that he should be touching regularly is his penis and other slime-emitting organs. 

As the penis is also the organ with which he clearly does most of his thinking, it makes much more sense for him to grab that appendage during times of stress. Grabbing any other part of his body is thus highly inappropriate. 

Secondly, "groper" sounds too much like "Groyper," a well-known Alt-Right meme, one of whose characteristics is also head touching. As explained by Know Your Meme:

"Groyper refers to an exploitable illustration of Pepe the Frog resting his chin on interlinked hands."

Mixing up a pervert like Frankin with one of the Alt-Right's most esteemed memes is therefore highly offensive. 

But what makes it even more wrong is that Groyper's pose is designed to signal smug superiority, something that it is highly inappropriate to show for a Senator about to be hounded out of office by the circular firing squad of the Left.

WOES FAILS TO ESTABLISH CHAD CREDENTIALS WITH PETTIBONE HOVER HAND

Popular Alt-Right Vlogger Millennial Woes had the perfect opportunity to scotch persistent rumours that he's not "chad" enough for the new, aggressively assertive post-Charlottesville Alt-Right but failed when he met up with pretty female YouTuber Brittany Pettibone at an unidentified restaurant location recently. 

Instead of showing how alpha he was by doing a "full Joe Biden" (with optional hair-sniffing), Woes instead resorted to some tame, beta-cuck hover handing when he awkwardly asked a waiter at the restaurant to take a photo of himself and Ms Pettibone. 

Woes, who has 36,470 YouTube subscribers, clearly felt intimidated by Ms. Pettibone's much larger subscriber count (54,194), leaving several centimetres between his hand and Ms. Pettibone's dulcet, lace-bedizened shoulder.

Invisible force field, turbo-charged air pocket, or esoteric Hitler reference (HH)?

Pettibone, whose name means "small erection" in English, had no such misgivings. She used her right arm to swoop in under Woes's undefended armpit to place a proprietorial arm around the plaid-shirted Scottish vlogger's coke-filled trunk, boosting her Cougar rating in the process, (Although Woes is ten years her senior, he is still considered technically younger due to NEET privilege, which does not apply to women.)

Joe Biden, the Alt-Right's role model when it comes to
interacting with women and law enforcement professionals. 

NPI'S WINTER CONFERENCE SHUT DOWN

NOTE: This news item was quoted by Salon in their recent article on the Alt-Right.

Spencer at Rocklands.

Richard Spencer's National Policy Institute (NPI) had its Winter conference shut down in "mid-flight" by the venue owners after they became aware of Spencer's true identity.

NPI had booked the venue for last Sunday (19th Nov), through a third-party logistics company that told the venue, Rocklands Farm, a winery and popular marriage venue in Montgomery County, Maryland, that it was merely for a "corporate gathering."

The event started at 11 a.m. and was scheduled to continue until 8 p.m. but was shut down around 4 p.m. after the venue's management learned of Spencer's identity. 

It appears that there was then something of a standoff, as conference attendees at first refused to leave. They only agreed to do so when Rocklands Farm agreed to refund all the money NPI had paid through the third-party logistics company. 

After this, the attendees, numbering around 100, tried to go to a grill restaurant in Alexandria, but were refused entry, possibly for non ideological reasons, as 100 is quite a large number to seat in a restaurant, even at the best of times. 

The group then went back to several "Airbnb" venues and ordered "pizza," according to a somewhat unclear article posted on Spencer's main website AltRight.com.

In short, the event appears to have been an unfortunate fiasco, although it seems that a lot of people had a fun time meeting Richard Spencer and other leading members of the Alt-Right.

In the wake of Charlottesville, it has become increasingly difficult to organise public Alt-Right events like this, as private venues are terrified of antifa. In recent years, NPI had been relying on the Ronald Reagan Building in Washington, a Federal building, that has a public duty to protect free speech, but this year they refused NPI's request to use their facilities, forcing Spencer's organisation to rely on a private venue. 

Compared to last November's NPI conference, which attracted around 300 people and such luminaries as Professor Kevin McDonald, Millennial Woes, and Tia Tequila, this year's NPI conference was a much lower key event, with much less publicity. But, despite this, it attracted much more concerted opposition, with even the Federal government denying NPI its facilities. 

The event last year was also the conference that shot Spencer to international fame -- or notoriety if you prefer -- when his "Hail Trump!" exclamation at the end of his speech was accompanied by a few "Nazi salutes" in the audience. 

Earlier in the day, Mike Enoch, who also spoke at that conference, gave an "ironic" Nazi salute from the stage to the audience, while Tia Tequila (below) was also filmed with "sieg hieling" fans at the same event.

Every single East Asian I have ever known thinks Nazi salutes are lulzy.

This year's event was much more "optics conscious," but to no avail.

The sabotaging of the conference puts NPI in an awkward situation, making it difficult to operate above the flashmob or private gathering level. 

Personally I would recommend NPI simply go "full gypsy": Rent a piece of private land somewhere, pack a few generators and a circus tent, and do all their own catering. Now that would be a lot harder to shut down, wouldn't it?

Podcast recorded at the NPI Conference (not paywall - we happy!!!):